SA Wines Online - nominated for the Decanter Specialist Wine Merchant of the Year 2011

Sa_wines_online_awarded_specialist_merchant_of_the_year
More great news from another of our clients this morning SA Wines Online -

"After coming away triumphantly with the 2010 prize for the Decanter Specialist Wine Merchant of the Year Award, in 2011 SA Wines Online are back to uphold their title as a specialist in South African wine in the UK.  In 2011, they find themselves up against some tough competition with retailers specialising from French wine to German but hope to come out on top for a second year running.

In the past year SA Wines Online have developed a new look website with more user friendly navigation, videos of the winelands, blogs and many other new features to educate and inspire the UK public to try and choose South African wines.

Kevin Gallagher, the Managing Director of SA Wines Online said that ’We have been helped by the tremendous improvements of quality, new varietals and great value for money currently offered by South African wines at all price points. Our UK customers are interested in discovering South African wines and are fascinated by the history of the South African wine industry and its development in the post  Apartheid era as well as the new initiatives for sustainable production and the Bio Diversity program. The massive improvement in the quality and range of styles of South Africa’s own Pinotage is also a revelation to most wine drinkers’. 

SA Wines Online hopes that their efforts this last year will be rewarded, either way they will continue to proudly fly the flag for the South African wine industry."

 

Apprentice winner searching for inspiration from a Sugarush Card

(download)

One of our clients (Sugarush) provides Thomas Pellereau (this years winner) with inspiration for the MYPY task.

Sugarush based in Norwich provide a range of original and contemporary greetings cards for all occasions including birthdays, anniversary cards, thank you and blank cards. The full range can be seen here - Sugarush Greetings Cards

It's not about the number of chocolate chips, but protecting privacy - EU Cookie Compliance

Cookiewise-flyer

 

We can provide a simple way to help you comply with the May 2011 EU Cookie Directive by giving your website visitors control over and understanding of the cookies being placed on their computer.

Over 95% of websites use independent or third party cookies (e.g. Google Analytics). 

We provide a simple way to help you comply with the May 2011 EU Cookie Directive by giving your website visitors control over and understanding of the cookies being placed on their computer. 

On 26 May 2011, the amended Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations came into force in the UK and EU. They include changes to the rules for cookies on websites, and introduce new powers for the Information Commissioner to serve penalties of up to £500,000 on UK companies who break the law. 

The rules previously required websites to tell visitors about cookies they used and to provide information about how to ‘opt out’. Most organisations did this by putting information in their privacy policy.

The new rules require in most cases that any website using cookies must ask the user’s consent before installing cookies. i.e. that a pop-up box or page asks for the user’s permission before installing any type of cookie. 

The law now states - 

A person [website] shall not store or gain access to information stored, in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user unless the requirements of paragraph (2) are met. 

(2) The requirements are that the subscriber or user of that terminal equipment-- (a) is provided with clear and comprehensive information about the purposes of the storage of, or access to, that information; and (b) has given his or her consent. 

A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers downloaded on to a device when the user accesses certain websites. Cookies allow a website to recognise a user’s machine. 

For more information please visit - http://www.yourcookies.co.uk

 

Preparing for World IPv6 Day on June 8th, 2011

On June 8th, 2011 -- World IPv6 Day (http://worldipv6day.org/) -- major web companies, including Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, and Microsoft, will enable IPv6 on many of their websites for 24 hours to test how IPv6 performs in the real world. 

More than 99.9% of people shouldn’t have any problems during this industry-wide test, but your experience on June 8th will depend on your computer and network configuration.
- If you only have IPv4, you’ll simply use IPv4 as usual and not see any test-related problems.
- If your configuration is ready for IPv6, you’ll automatically use IPv6 and not see any test-related problems.
- In rare cases if you have IPv6 enabled but not configured properly, you may have connectivity issues with Google Apps and other test sites on June 8th.

If you’d like to start checking your organization’s IPv6 preparedness before June 8th, you can instruct your users to visit ipv6test.google.com from the devices, like primary work machines, tablet devices and home computers.  If you discover IPv6 connectivity problems, you can find troubleshooting tips and more information here: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&topic=8995&answer=1299266

via Google Apps

A Guide To Website Terms And Conditions

By Lyndsay Gough, Commercial Solicitor Specialising In Internet And Ecommerce Law

Are you confident that your website fulfils all the legal requirements relating to e-commerce, data protection and privacy? Lyndsay Gough provides a back-to-basics guide to your legal obligations.

Creating an alluring website is a fundamental first step for most businesses, especially ones trading online. Legal issues governing that website and sales from it cannot be overlooked and appropriate terms and conditions are not only an essential legal requirement, but a vital means of gaining customer confidence and building a credible brand.

Online businesses are subject to the panoply of laws which already apply to the traditional retailer, as well as many additional provisions which apply to online operators and which can trip up the unwary trader. These include the Electronic Commerce Regulations 2002 (EC Directive) and the Consumer Protection Regulations 2000(Distance Selling Regulations). 

What legal documents do I need on my website?

There are three key legal documents:

Terms and conditions for the supply of goods or services - as well as the normal sales contracts provisions relating to price and payment, restrictions on the supplier's liability and other standard clauses, there are special requirements for e-commerce contracts.

Privacy policy - there are obligations under UK data protection laws for all businesses which collect personal data about website visitors and customers, dealing with the collection, storage, use and transfer of that personal data.

Terms and conditions for use of the website - dealing with the ownership, use and availability of the website itself, prohibiting spamming and unsuitable postings to interactive sites and asserting the owner's intellectual property rights in site content. 

Can I use our usual business terms on the website?

A canny supplier may be able to recycle his normal trading terms for online use, but even well-drafted ‘offline' terms will need tailoring to comply with the additional rules for website contracts.

For example, all sole traders, partnerships, companies and other legal entities must disclose certain key details, such as trading address, email address, VAT registration number, a company's country of registration and its registered number. There are special rules where the supplier is a member of a regulated profession or industry or a member of a trade body.

What is needed in the website terms and conditions?

There are special rules for e-commerce contracts. For example, the customer must be told whether the price includes VAT and delivery costs and exactly how and when the online contract is made.

It is also necessary under the Distance Selling Regulations to notify consumers of their right to cancel an online contract and obtain a full refund of any money paid, even if the goods are not faulty. A ‘consumer' is generally someone who is not buying on behalf of a business.

There are precise rules on cancellation and the required notices, but consumers must be told that they have at least 7 working days after delivery to return the goods, even if they are not defective. There are exceptions for certain goods, such as bespoke or perishable items.

Are your website terms and conditions visible enough?

No matter how good the website terms and conditions may be, if insufficient steps have been taken to draw them to the customer's attention before the contract is made, they will not be ‘incorporated' into the contract and they will not be legally binding.

Customers should first be directed to the relevant terms and conditions and privacy policy. This could be achieved via hyperlinks to the documents or a requirement to scroll through them. The customer should then be required to click on an ‘Accept' button confirming that they agree to and accept the website terms, before being permitted to place an order.

What are the penalties for getting it wrong?

The Office of Fair Trading and certain other consumer protection bodies can apply to courts for enforcement orders, called ‘stop now orders', to prevent suppliers from infringing relevant consumer protection legislation.

Failure to comply with privacy laws can sometimes lead to criminal sanctions with company directors potentially facing personal liability.

 

 

VIA http://www.freshbusinessthinking.com 

http://www.freshbusinessthinking.com/articles_print.php?CID=8&AID=9088

Social Media - Breaking The Myth

Social-media-mix-360

In the traditional marketing communications model, the content, frequency, timing, and medium of communications by the organisation is generally in collaboration with an external agent, i.e. advertising agencies, marketing research firms and public relations firms. However, the growth of social media has impacted the way you can communicate. The internet now provides a set of tools that allow people to build social and business networks, share information and collaborate on projects online.

Social media marketing programs usually centre on efforts to create content that attracts attention and encourages readers to share it with their social networks. A message spreads from user to user and presumably resonates because it is coming from a trusted, third-party source, as opposed to the brand or company itself.

Social media has become a platform that is easily accessible to anyone with internet access either by mobile phone or computer. Increased communication for companies can foster brand awareness and often, improved customer service.

Additionally, social media serves as a relatively inexpensive platform to get there message out very quickly and implement marketing campaigns.

So after all the hype Social Media is the oldest form of advertising “Word of Mouth”

 

 

HOW TO: Launch Any Product Using Social Media

Guy Kawasaki is the author of Enchantment: The Art of Changing Hearts, Minds and Actions.

On March 8, I introduced my tenth book. There are few processes that I enjoy more than a product introduction, and this one enabled me to try many social media techniques and online tools and services. After only a week, the book was on the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Publishers Weekly bestseller lists. I have to conclude that at least some of that success was due to the promotional techniques I employed.

Here, I’d like to outline the 12 things that I did to launch my new book, including information about costs and vendors I used, as well as analytics. Though my “product” is a book, the methods I used can apply to product introductions in general. Hopefully this post will provide marketers with ideas for how to launch just about anything.

1. Facebook

A Facebook Fan Page is the quickest and easiest way to get a web presence for a new product. These pages are very valuable for building community and spreading the word because Facebook offers built-in capabilities such as commenting, liking, sharing and uploading photos and videos. Fan Pages are not as flexible as websites, but implementing social features is much easier.

The challenge with Fan Pages, and websites of any kind, is to attract visitors. One thing that I did was to offer a PDF version of my first book, The Macintosh Way, to anyone who “Liked” the page for my new book. (The rights to my first book had reverted to me, so there was no cost.)

There were a few costs involved. I used Hyperarts to design my Fan Page, which cost about $2,500. I used OfficeDrop to scan The Macintosh Way, which cost in the between $100 and $200.

2. Website

After two months, I revisited my decision to rely primarily on a Facebook Fan Page and supplemented my existing website with materials about my book. The resources I wanted to provide would have overwhelmed my Facebook Page with tabs. I wanted a way to provide my bio, pictures and bookstores without Facebook membership requirements. No matter how many people are on Facebook, it doesn’t have all the people in the world. Facebook is also a private business, which means they can (and often do) unilaterally make major changes with little warning to users. The lesson here is that while a Facebook Fan Page is great, its flexibility and capacity are limited. You’re also subject to the whims of the company.

My goal with the website was to make it as easy as possible for reviewers to obtain all the background information and pictures necessary to review my book. I even supplemented the picture page with photos of enchanting people (e.g. Queen Latifah), places (e.g. Istanbul), and things (e.g. 1964 1/2 Ford Mustang) to provide a subtle reference to the title (Enchantment). I contracted my buddy Will Mayall to make the book website, and you should expect to pay around $2,500 to create a simple brochure site from scratch.

In addition to resources for reviewers, I added audio and video to my website. Because I do many speaking engagements, it was easy to amass a collection of video and podcasts about the book. I provided them for two reasons. First, they are selling tools for potential readers. Second, reviewers can embed them on their websites and blogs for their readers. I used Craig Hosoda to edit my videos, which you can expect to cost a few hundred dollars per clip. When you’re speaking, if an organization is already recording your presentation, you won’t have to pay for a crew. If you have to pay for a crew, however, it will cost $1,500 or so, plus editing.

3. Review Copies

Most publishers send out 100 to 200 galleys/books to reviewers (this number will vary depending upon how well known you are, if you’re a first time author, the size of your publisher, etc.). These promotional copies go to recognized book reviewers and A-listers in a segment. I decided to target a different review audience. I own a site that aggregates RSS feeds from about 20,000 bloggers. I offered a review copy to all 20,000 people no matter what their blog topic; 1,300 requested a copy, and we sent one to anyone who asked. I also used eCairn to identify the key social media bloggers and offered a copy to them, too. Because I wanted broad adoption of the ideas in this book, my goal was to get reviews in as broad a spectrum of blogs as possible, instead of only the usual book review and business blogs.

All told, we sent out approximately 1,600 copies. This resulted in approximately 150 interviews and 200 reviews before the book was available. These reviews appeared in blogs that covered areas ranging from beauty products to dog training.

The amount you can expect to pay for something like this depends on how you count the cost of a galley or a book plus shipping. A good estimate is $10 per book or galley including shipping, so this cost $16,000, but my publisher paid for this, not me. I also compiled all the reviews on a webpage for two reasons. First, to create the overwhelming impression that reluctance to read the book was futile. Second, to acknowledge all the reviewers for their hard work.

The lesson here is to cover the earth with as many product trials as possible. Don’t focus on only the A-listers — “nobodies” are the new somebodies in the flattened, social networking world we now live in. You never know who’s going to make your product “tip.”

4. Email

I’m a big believer in email marketing. It cuts right to the point. People either open the email or they don’t. They either click through to a page or they don’t. They either buy or they don’t. Every step is measurable.

On the day that my book hit the stores, we sent out 160,000 emails; 130,000 of those email addresses came from thirty years of making contacts, and 30,000 came from AlwaysOn, as a favor. Building a quality pool of email contacts is clearly something anyone can replicate, but it takes time.

Of the 160,000 recipients, 3.75% clicked through to the order page. Email may be old school, but it’s cheap and effective.

We used Emailvision to do the mailing, which costs $1,000 per month for the service, plus a $4,500 setup charge. It was no cost — other than time — for the email addresses.

5. Pay Per Click

To tell you the truth, I don’t understand the black magic of pay per click (PPC), so I relied on a buddy from my Apple days named David Szetela. He ran a six-week program on Google AdWords, Facebook ads and Twitter (Promoted Tweets) for search terms such as “Dale Carnegie.” In addition to obtaining several hundred pre-orders, the Twitter campaign for Enchantment caught the
attention of the Wall Street Journal, who gave me a nice plug.

We used Clix Marketing to manage the campaign, plus Google and Twitter placement fees. You can expect to pay as little or as much as you can afford on PPC marketing. You can create the campaigns by yourself and pay a few hundred bucks for the ad placements, or hire an agency and pay thousands for their fees and expanded ad placement. The lesson here is that PPC may seem like black magic, but it’s worth trying for a few thousand dollars to see if anything will stick.

6. Photo Contest

In order to generate awareness of my book, I ran a photo contest. I used a Facebook app that enabled people to submit pictures in five categories, and a popular vote determined the finalists. I selected the winners. The prizes were five Nikon 3100s and an Apple iPad. That contest resulted in 1,150 entries, 35,000 visits, 70,000 entry views and 10,500 votes.

What I learned was that people love photo contests. It’s an easy and inexpensive way to build buzz. Beware, however, the people who are professional contestants and people who game the system. At the end, manually pick the winners and don’t depend solely on popular votes. Also be wary of local contest laws, which may govern the types of contests you can run and the value of the prizes you hand out.

I used Strutta to design the contest app, which can cost about $2,000. The prizes (in this case a few Nikon cameras and an iPad) bumped up the costs about another $4,000 or so.

7. Quizzes

The quiz started as a final exam in the book, but I also wanted an online version so people could determine if they should to read the book. I created online versions for both Facebook and my website.

At first, I had only a Facebook version, but similar to my Fan Page, I realized that there are people on the planet who weren’t members of Facebook yet, so I also created a standalone website version. Here’s a mind blower: Approximately 700 people took the Facebook version, and 2,900 people took the standalone website version, even though it came out two weeks after the Facebook version. This is something to think about. Don’t focus all your energy on Facebook.

I used Wildfire, which costs about $400 per month, to create a self-serve quiz. I hired Electric Pulp to create the website version, something that costs in the neighborhood of $3,000.

8. Infographic

I love infographics because they can communicate so much in so little space. I wanted to create an infographic that would provide an overview of the book and act as a resource that bloggers could embed in their reviews. Many bloggers did in fact use the infographic I had made as part of their review. To make the graphic, I hired Column Five. Good infographics can cost up to $1,500 to 2,000, but it’s worth the return. Lots of bloggers like to embed infographics and they have the potential to go viral.

9. Badges, Buttons, Banners and Stickers

I created badges, buttons, and banners so that people could declare that they are enchanting. These badges aren’t exactly ads for the book — they’re more like a “seal of approval” that people can display. They do, however, link to the book’s Facebook Fan Page and allow people to promote the book. I also included the badges on other websites that I own and operate — essentially advertising one of my products on another. In the first few weeks, there were approximately 100,000 impressions of the badges around the web. Lesson learned: People like to embed badges and wear them on their clothes. This is a cheap way to gain exposure.

I used Samuel Toh and Ana Frazao to design the badges and banners. You can expect a cost of about $50 per badge for something like this. I liked the website badges so much that I asked Sam Toh to design a sticker for SXSW. Then my buddies at Walls360 printed 2,500 of them. You can see them in action here. These are no ordinary stickers. They are printed on fabric so you can use them over and over, which means they come at a premium and cost about $1 each.

Disclosure: The author is an adviser to Walls360.

10. Wallpapers

Once you have an infographic and badges, you might as well go all the way and create wallpapers too. These wallpapers enable people to have book-themed desktops and homescreens on their computers, phones and iPads. I don’t expect many people to use them, but what the heck, right? I used Ana Frazao again for this project, and you can expect to pay about $400.

11. PowerPoint

If the topic of enchantment proves popular, organizations will pay me 50 times a year to give a speech based on the book. Therefore, skimping on a PowerPoint presentation or trying to make it myself made little sense. Joshua Bell doesn’t use a cheap violin and Yo-Yo Ma doesn’t use a toy cello, so why should I use a crappy PowerPoint presentation? Ana Frazao was my designer of choice on this project, as well, and the price for this can be around $3,600. But remember: A slide presentation is a window into your soul. Do you want your soul to look cheap and unprofessional?

12. Thank You Slideshow

It takes a village to finish a book: publisher personnel, book designers, beta readers, web designers, graphic designers, and more. You would be amazed. I tried to list all of them in the Acknowledgments section of my book, but that felt very 1.0. So I asked my buddies Brad Jefferson and Andrew Jacobson at Animoto to create a thank you slideshow for the team behind my book.

You can expect to pay up to $50 per month if you use the professional version, with which you create your own slideshows (Brad and Andrew did mine as a favor to me). However, for the small amount of trouble of collecting pictures and laying them down to a music track, you can show some gratitude to the people who helped you launch your product. It’s worth the time and expense!

Conclusion

While my new product is a book, you can apply these ideas to almost any product introduction. Every one of these vendors did a great job for me, and I would use them again in a second. Of course, when I’ve provided cost estimates in the past, there are always people who say, “You paid that much for that? I could have done it for a third of the price!” Yeah, well, there are two things to consider.

First, I’m providing ballpark numbers for what people should expect to pay — I didn’t necessarily pay all of these prices.

Second, and more importantly, even if I did pay these prices, I didn’t have the bandwidth or desire to shop around, check out vendors and negotiate. Time is money and I was plenty busy making three speeches a week around the world, parenting four kids and being interviewed three to five times per day. And there’s a lesson in that too: If you try to optimize every decision and you define optimization as doing things as cheaply as possible, you might end up with a steaming pile of crap. The big picture is to launch a product as big and fast possible and to succeed — not save the most money.

Interested in more Business resources? Check out Mashable Explore, a new way to discover information on your favorite Mashable topics.

Images courtesy of Flickr, Shutterhacks, Easternblot.

Our New Servers & Firewall

We are today setting up and configuring our latest 2 servers behind our own new Cisco firewall full specs can be found below:-

Linux CentOS

PowerEdge 2950 Xeon
- Dual Intel Xeon Quad-Core E5420
- 8GB Memory
- Dell PERC 6i RAID Controller
- 2x 1TB 7200rpm Hard Disk
- RAID 1
- CentOS 5.x x64

Windows 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
- 8GB Memory
- Adaptec 5405 RAID Controller
- 2x 160GB 7200rpm Hard Disk
- RAID 1
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Web R2 x86-64

Google: The search engine that lost its way - The Independent

Google: The search engine that lost its way

The hegemony of Google on the internet is under attack from 'content farms' and other rivals

By Stephen Foley

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

 It looks as clean and simple as it always has: the little white letterbox into which we type our search queries and begin our light-speed journeys across the world wide web. Behind the unchanging facade, however, Google's engineers are engaged in a frantic, never-ending battle to make sure that the search results we get are the ones we expect.

The battle is not new. But over the past few months, for perhaps the first time in the 13 years since Google revolutionised the way we surf the web, it has felt like Google is not always winning.

Perhaps you have noticed. Useless web pages are appearing high up its search results, pages from never-before-seen websites that promise the information we are looking for, yet seem to contain only ads. At its worst, it is as if the spam filter has been flung open and all the monstrous emptiness of the web has been revealed. Google admitted: "We're not perfect."

What is going on? The bottom line is that Google is a victim of its own success. It dominates the web. In the UK, it is the most visited website, and nine out of 10 search queries go through Google, according to the web analyst Hitwise. To get traffic to your webpage, you have to appear high in Google's search results. Meanwhile, spending on online advertising passed spending on newspaper ads last year and is set to grow by 10 per cent this year. Since advertisers pay per page view, or per click on an ad, the spoils from clawing your way up the Google rankings are high indeed.

There are huge incentives to try to game the system – which is why there are ever more parties trying to game the system.

Google says its search quality is higher than it has ever been, in terms of relevance and comprehensiveness. At the same time, it admits it is going to have to tackle new phenomena, such as blogs that automatically plagiarise other people's content just to steal their traffic, or so-called "content farms" which produce vast quantities of low-quality webpages.

"As pure web spam has decreased over time, attention has shifted instead to 'content farms', which are sites with shallow or low-quality content," Matt Cutts, Google's principal engineer, wrote in a mea culpa blog post last week.

"In 2010, we launched two major algorithmic changes focused on low-quality sites. Nonetheless, we hear the feedback from the web loud and clear: people are asking for even stronger action on content farms and sites that consist primarily of spammy or low-quality content ... The fact is that we're not perfect and, combined with users' skyrocketing expectations of Google, these imperfections get magnified in perception. However, we can and should do better."

Google already tweaks its algorithm two or three times a day. It's as if the scientists at Coca-Cola had to come up with a new secret formula every few hours. The worry is that the internet is changing around it, and that Google itself is the problem.

The system that Google's founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, invented blew away the less sophisticated search engines, such as Yahoo and AltaVista, that existed before. By judging the importance of a page by counting the number of pages that linked to it (and judging the importance of those pages), they changed the way searching worked. Ever since, web publishers – from porn merchants to multinational media giants, and from individual bloggers to corporate brand managers – have spent their time working on "search engine optimisation".

This has marketing departments creating "landing pages" buried inside corporate sites, to hit all the different possible permutations of a search query relating to their industry. Bloggers linking to each other. A whole army of advisers to tell publishers where to put what keywords on a page.

And now, content farms. Intriguingly, one is on a roadshow of investors right now, ahead of a New York stock market flotation this week – a flotation that got a last- minute spanner put in the works by Mr Cutts's blog post.

Demand Media, founded by Richard Rosenblatt, the boss of MySpace who sold the social networking pioneer to News Corporation, has created a mirror-image version of the Google algorithm, which suggests a page that would do well in search results – and then builds it. The company, whose own-brand sites include eHow.com and thousands of others, has been criticised for producing low-quality content often barely better than spam. Yahoo and AOL are experimenting with similar content farms.

Demand Media is trying to raise $58m, with Goldman Sachs leading the offering. Analysts think Google's hint of a clampdown could hurt demand for Demand Media shares. "If Google tweaks its algorithm in a way that causes Demand's content to fall in the search rankings this could decrease traffic significantly and lead to material revenue losses," Rory Maher, of Hudson Square Research told clients. "Even small changes, can have an impact.

Such is the power of the Google algorithm. Our favourite search engine company doesn't just order the internet for us. It shapes it.

HTML 5 Just Wants to Be HTML From Now On

HTML 5 Just Wants to Be HTML From Now On

HTML 5 Just Wants to Be HTML From Now On

With all the hype surrounding HTML5, the latest web standard has become a bit self-conscious of its designation. Therefore, it demands that you just refer to it—and all future iterations—as HTML. Got it?

WHATWG and W3C, the main organizations leading the charge to create a final HTML5 spec, realized that updates and new standards are moving at such rapid speeds that it's silly to adhere to snapshots of the HTML standard. Instead, HTML will simply be a living, ever-evolving specification, which it basically has been for years (the updates in between versions were just called "drafts"). So keep this in mind, lest some mouth breather hears you slipping up and starts screaming about how you're a noob. [WHATWG]

Contact information for this author is not available.